Touted as a model for the practice of modern democracy in
Africa, the resilience of how solid Ghana’s democracy is would be put to
the test once again come November 7, 2016. The country adopted for
itself the practice of democracy with the promulgation of the 1992
constitution, which came into force 1993. The country ever since has
proven to really grasp what it takes to satisfy the requirements of the
practice.
It has since the general elections of 1992,
moved on to organized a relative five successive elections. In spite of
the obvious envious feat chalked over the decade with regards to the
organization of credible free and fair elections, the electoral process
cannot be overly rated to have fully arrived yet. The untold realties
are that, the comparisons have been with fellow African States, who seem
to be grumbling with the practice over the years. In the country’s bid
to rub shoulders with advance democracies like the United States,
Britain and a host of many others. It is advisable efforts are made to
tackle identified challenges before they degenerate into something
untoward.
Indeed, the advanced democracies being alluded to,
others might argue are yet to arrive either, and certainly have had
challenges of their own, but the overt nature of the challenges as it
pertains to Ghana’s still maturing democracy, certainly affords the
country no chance of sweeping issues under the carpet as if all is well.
Several or bits of the challenges faced by the Ghanaian electoral
system were brought to bear during the 2012 electoral petition hearing.
And
the way forward in the words of former UN Secretary General is, as a
nation “We must not be blind to the flaws in our electoral system that
the judicial review has brought to light” It is such a critical
situation which demands for concerns from all, who hold the peace of the
county Ghana at heart. It is this concern, I believe that has premised
the argument over the years that, between the peace the country has
enjoyed till now and war is a thin line. If this is the case, what do we
have to do as a people?
I believe now is the time to wake up to
the challenges that face us and confront them. With barely seven months
to the November 2016 elections, This article would set the basis for the
need for more consented efforts to tackle the situation by opening the
country, stakeholders, likewise donor communities to the challenges that
stare us in the face as a country.  What then are the challenges going
forward? This discussion as much as possible gives the theme a more
holistic treatment from the perspective of the period before, during and
after elections.
The discussion should better be understood from
this point because, according to the Kofi Annan International Peace
Training Center (KAIPTC), elections 2012 categorized under these three
phase of the electoral process revealed that, the pre-election recorded
57.7 percent of violent incidents, while as the election and the period
after recorded 30 and 12.2 percent respectively.
For a better
understanding, the challenges could better be spread under three broad
topics, thus, institutional, human and technological. Under
institutional, the consideration should be focused on, how empowered the
electoral commission, security agencies like the Police, civil society
groups are to lend their support and live up to their responsibilities
in order that, no stone is left unturned in getting the right thing
done.
Our institutions, especially the security agencies were very
much exposed in the period prior to elections 2012 that, they failed
woefully in their duty to analyze “secret tapes” purported to have
reveal grand schemes by certain political actors within the NPP and NDC
to subvert the electoral process. In my opinion, there should be better
reasons for these cases that were widely reported to be left on attended
to. These agencies per the sensitive nature of their responsibilities
to the state are ideally expected to be non-bias. This unfortunately is
not the reality.
Many culprits in the past have been left off the
hook because of their political affiliations. If this becomes the
normative, then the citizenry begin to develop a sense of mistrust in
the services rendered by these agencies. People in the long run would
take issues into their own hands because of the feeling that these
security agencies are not credible enough to deliver their services
devoid of fear and favor.
This invariably is a threat to the
services these agencies are constitutionally mandated to offer the
larger public especially in times of milestone events like elections.
Though I do not seek to justify the use of thugs and “macho” men in
policing or protecting whether election materials or a political
interest, it can be argued that, this situation as widespread exist
because of this general mistrust held by the public.
The media
space arguably poses a greater threat. The media space now than ever has
become an avenue for political actors to engage each other in endless
banters. This, more than often has resulted in unwarranted exchanges
that are a likely recipe for inciting their respective followers against
each other. Credited as one of the few countries that strictly uphold
media freedom to its apex, it is no surprise that, the media field now
attracts so much investment.
The landscape has been proliferated
with so many television and radio stations. If the saying that “to him
that much is given much is expected is true,” then as a responsible
country, now is the time we have to churn efforts into drafting policies
that should serve as guide to regulate the works of these media
outlets. The influx of the social media platforms seems to have placed
the fight beyond reach.
Political activists have chance on the
unregulated nature of the medium to churn out certain untrue
information, which on majority of cases borders on the sensitive nature
of maintaining the relative peace the country enjoys. It would be very
unfortunate to assume an adamant posture and do nothing to curtail the
enormous challenges the social media platform poses to the peace of the
country in the 2016 elections. The statistics are that, as of November
15, 2015; there were as many as 2,900,000.00 Ghanaians registered on
face book alone.
It may be true that the figure could be halved
for users on other equally vibrant ones like instagram and twitter. It
is worth noting that the Ghanaian now than never relies so much on
social media for information. And if what happened during elections 2012
is anything to go by, then it only means many Ghanaians would depend on
social media sites like face book and twitter for results from the
various voting centers come November 7, 2016.
However, it appears
the unregulated nature of these sites would pose a serious challenge to
the country if issues are not taken seriously. Many in current times
have used the social media platform to spread hoax which nearly, if not,
has sent the whole country into some state of confusion. An example of
the threat if care is not taken, an unregulated social media platform
poses is the case of the claimed circulation from the office of the
President, which went viral earlier this year announcing a ministerial
reshuffle, only for us to be informed hours after that there was no
reshuffle as purported by the circulation. Another sensitive issue for
consideration is the source of funding of our political parties.
Politics
is now money, and essentially without money, no one can survive the
beauty of the gigantic billboards, flayers and the lots that are common
with the season. I have not forgotten what it takes to get an
endorsement from the so called celebrities. And I doubt anyone of them
endorse for a song. This is money. So the question is, where do our
politicians get the monies to finance their activities? What do I mean
by their activities?
By this, I make reference to campaigning,
rallies, campaign songs or tunes and the lots. When it comes to funding
activities of political parties like campaigns or administrative duties,
the realities are that, parties might be forced to solicit for
financial support beyond national borders. The dangers are that most of
these supports come with strings attached to them. This eventually has
led to the numerous cases of abuse of incumbency and its accompanying
corruption. Now is the time for regulation. Why the need to regulate
political source of funding?
In the wisdom of the advocates of
regulating political source of funds, regulations are necessary in that,
it would help to safeguard the political process from unnecessary
foreign interest and interference. The shared believe also is that in
regulating the sources of funding, the national interest shall be
protected from falling into criminal hands. The absence of such
regulations has led to the situation where parties, both old and new to
search for more lucrative sources of financing, especially from external
private sector sources in exchange for investment opportunities as well
as leverage on the international scene.
Worst, is the possibility
of entanglement of political parties with the international, domestic
and regional criminal community. The benefits of a regulation of a kind
are transparency, limitation on political discretion and the opportunity
of creating a political environment built on greater accountability and
a consolidated democratic practice. To be able to arrive at this aim,
the various national legislative bodies, civil society groups and the
donor community ought to help the country in the drafting and passing
into law of a law to regulate how political parties source for funds now
and the in the future.
The Institute of Economic Affairs -Ghana
have also suggested that, for the country to be able to fight such
tendencies in the future, a consented effort should be taken to
implement the Akosombo 2 declaration on enhanced public support for
political parties. It further advocated the establishment of political
party’s support, which would be used to support the activities of these
political parties. On top of the list is the Electoral Commission with
its bits of challenges.
It is not only faced with the problem of
funding, but staffing and the difficulty in winning the trust of the
people. Yes, there are still masses out there that cannot and do not
keep trust in the abilities of the commission to organize a credible
free and fair election. But whatever the mistrust, we should not lose
sight of the fact that, it is this same commission that has seen us
through all these years. Our neighbors have even trust in the abilities
of the commission to have in times past sort for their advice in their
given situations, why not we ourselves?
I believe the commission
like never before shall deliver. But the EC definitely cannot do it
alone, therefore there is the need we lend our supports to this common
cause. The issue of trust, I think emanates from the power vested in a
single party President to appoint who heads the commission at a point in
time. But the President I trust cannot make a decision that would not
favor the country.
Samuel Tettey, the Director of Elections at the
EC, revealed that experience gathered from the NPP and the NDC
primaries showed the commission has a crucial challenge of
malfunctioning of biometric equipment ahead of the 2016 general
elections. My simple opinion, it is man that made the machine, and what
man expects the machine to do, man himself can better do. And it is
simply lies in our sense of loving and doing right. Our yes should be a
yes and no, a no. No matter how perfect the machine can be, it cannot
beat the perfection of man.
These are far reaching exposition on
what lies ahead of the country come November 7, 2016. The fact of the
case is simple; the world is watching and has a full expectation that
the country does not fail this time round. The former chief of the
Nigeria Electoral Commission, Professor Attahiru Jega has urged the
country to beat Nigeria by ensuring that, the forth coming elections are
free, fair and credible.
At the 25th anniversary celebration of
the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), Prof Jega attributed at length
that, Nigeria did not disappoint in staging a very successful, peaceful,
free, fair and credible elections. He urged that the country used the
Nigeria elections as the standard in convincing the world. If the
Nigerian experience is anything to go by, then it is prudent the country
considers all the necessary reforms that their system was allowed to
experience in other to replicate a similar feat come November 7th.
The
world is watching to once more applaud us for the success we have
enjoyed since the birth of our democracy. And in making it, we must be
informed that even the slightest of effort counts! As religious as we
are, I cannot end without saying God bless our homeland.


No comments:
Post a Comment